Search Results

"Fun" and "productive" aren't your typical words used to describe testing, but with PANACEA, testing is more than just a task. Capture meaningful data, get quicker results with less effort, and make faster decisions. GPS Receiver Testing From the Lab to the Field DOWNLOAD PDF By Safran Federal Systems It’s Hard to Keep Time and Data Straight Multiple receivers testing in parallel Time tagging and error computation in real-time Data in numerous formats-apples-to-apples comparison Comprehensive data logging with simple quick look reports Agile testing - test and adapt quickly using results Final reports and conclusions automatically generated Leveraging PANACEA, it’s possible to script entire tests, control hardware, and log data. Getting Results with Less Effort - Making Field Tests Fun and Productive GPS vulnerability testing began with the creation of the NAVWAR program and investigates navigation system performance in the presence of interference signals. This testing is crucial for the design, development, fielding, sustainment and mission planning of the DoD as well as commercial PNT systems. The testing is typically conducted in three steps involving modeling and simulation, lab/ chamber testing, and live fire field test exercises. Safran professionals have been supporting all three stages since the early 2000’s when NAVWAR programs were starting to come out. Safran has continued to support these programs up to the creation of The Joint Navigation Warfare Center (JNWC) which is specifically tasked to work in this area. While they are the lead organization, numerous product groups and vendors have the requirement to test their equipment to better support their customers. These engineers continually develop different tests and methods to evaluate their systems. With compounding test variables from evolving threats to complex integrations, the testing process and ability to capture meaningful results is daunting. PANACEA was built to support hardware-in-the-loop testing regardless of whether it’s in the lab, chamber or at a live fire field test. Beginning with lab testing, PANACEA reduces the risks of field tests and identifies the projected results allowing for organizations to concentrate on the tests that matter most. These pre-run scenarios can then be prepared for live fire field testing. Similar hardware can then be used to reduce field testing costs while also streamlining the test execution and errors that may result from human control. Using PANACEA,timelines can be simple or complex with the ability to change signal interferences quickly and accurately. The units under test are also controlled, configured, and reporting data to the PANACEA computer, allowing for the time synchronization between live fire events and the logged receiver data. The true power is the knowledge gained in real-time, allowing testers to quickly quantify test success or failures with the ability to be agile and retest scenarios on the fly. Lab Testing Prior testing in the lab is paramount to a successful field exercise. Understanding the systems capabilities and pre-running the scenarios of interest provide a baseline to form hypotheses from. Thousands of scenarios can automatically be tested and then modified to arrive at the scenarios of highest interest. Engineers can then use these tested and calibrated scenarios at field events for increased success. These baselines also support a benchmark for field testers to understand if things are “going well” in the field. Lab testing also vets the data collection process and enables final report baselines which often forces the testers to rethink the questions that need to be asked, and the data required to answer those questions. Configuring Units Under Test (UUTs) The most important part of any test is the UUT. Ensuring the UUT is configured correct such that data can be gathered on its performance while not impacting the test. This setup could be identical to the lab setup, again reducing risk and cost. One major difference when field testing versus lab testing is that the timeline continues to move forward instead of a fixed start and stop time. PANACEA allows the user to select the start time to be time synchronized with a receiver/live sky orto use the PC system time. This time scale allows all the receiver data to be gathered and coordinated to permit apples-to-apples comparison. A truth reference is also included (A GNSS receiver tracking a non-effected constellation) to permit real-time error computations while dynamic or at arbitrary points. The other option would be to presurvey the points and use those as the reference in your scenario. Taking the Lab to the Field n preparation for field testing, the inevitable question of what hardware will be used comes up. In some cases, lab equipment must stay in a sterile environment, but in many cases, lab equipment can be outfitted to support field tests as well. The value is more than the added cost of having to purchase two separate systems. Using common equipment reduces risk in commonality between tests as well as operations, maintenance and tester training in operating different equipment. PANACEA has been built to support the direct injection of RF as well as Over-The-Air (OTA) transmission ensuring that field tests match what was run in the lab. Data Reduction and Dissemination While the focus of a field test is generally on the test articles, participants and timelines, a larger consideration should be the data collection process and how that data will be used to arrive at conclusions. Many hours are spent on building test log formats, time scales, and data entry forms. These are still beneficial to provide cross checks, but the focus should be on automating the data collection and the ability to quickly and confidently analyze the data. Time stamping is crucial, and in some cases, external references must be used. These files should also have a consistent format to enable easy comparisons and analysis without question. These files along with the analysis artifacts need to be made available to support the report and permit future testers to dig into the data in preparation for future tests. PANACEA and Panorama provide a cohesive data collection and reporting capability that enables testers to show the data in real-time providing near instant after action reporting. By providing senior leaders and test supervisors results within hours after the test completion, decisions regarding how to proceed with the following tests can be made as opposed to blindly testing and collecting data. The quick look reports can then be created the same week and provide results for a reduced timeline. In most cases, the longer the reporting takes and the further from the test event the analyst is pushed, the more likely the report will be flawed. Summary The ability to conduct them as efficiently as possible has always been a function of understanding the systems in the planning process and the ability to quickly and cohesively gather data during the event. PANACEA was designed specifically for these actions and has become a primary resource for many organizations conducting NAVWAR exercises. Using common hardware, processes, and reporting in all phases of testing, PANACEA provides the lowest cost, risk and schedule while enabling the highest results. Maybe the least considered attribute to testing in this manner is the tester feedback. Making the tests “fun” and less stressful on test engineers also promotes better results. Stress free test engineers tend to focus on the results and conclusions and less on the laborious button pushing, data filing, and recollection of what happened during the tests. DOWNLOAD PDF

Beyond the Desk is a Safran Federal Systems' official blog, offering an inside look at our careers, culture, and the people who make it all happen. Beyond The Desk Beyond The Desk is a Safran Federal Systems’ official blog, offering an inside look at our careers, culture, and the people who make it all happen. From employee stories to workplace insights, we’re sharing what it means to thrive together at Safran. Women Rising: Strength, Mentorship, and Collective Success Advice on career success, her vision for the future of women in leadership, and overcoming challenges—join us as Joanne Downs shares it all, here! Button The Blueprint for Engineering Success : Part 1 Get to know the real world of engineering with Brent Abbott, on how collaboration can elevate your career and much more! Button Engineering Her Future: Women in Science Kristina’s path is one to inspire women and girls who dream of making a mark in the STEM world. Read her story. Button Succeeding Together: Q&A With VP of Human Resources In this special feature, we sit down with Holly Cicconi-Eggleston, Vice President of Human Resources, where she shares valuable advice you don't want to miss! Button Shaping The World Around Us From an aspiring young builder to an Engineering Manager, get to know Michael through a Q&A. Button A Day in the Life of an IT Network Technician Join us as we follow IT Network Technician Sudeep Soni through a day on the job. Button Women In Leadership: Suzanne Kwak As we celebrate Women's Month, we sit down with Suzanne Kwak, Executive VP of Products and Engineering, who has carved out a path of success for herself and the many more women to come. Button Breaking Barriers: Women In Science Her journey in STEM is one of determination, problem-solving, and breaking barriers. Prepare to be inspired by Lindsay's journey! Button

Learn how Safran Federal Systems' products can work for your applications with white papers, tech briefs, use cases and more. PNT Library Dig into real-world PNT and GNSS applications. APNT INS Jamming & Spoofing LEO NAVWAR Simulation Use Cases Sort library by tags: NTP vs PTP Understanding Time Synchronization Protocols and Choosing the Right Mission-Critical Solution The problem of synchronizing time to coordinate action is not just an old one, but a crucial one in our modern interconnected world. NTP and PTP, two common approaches, play a significant role in solving this problem. Discover their differences. Kevin Stottler Field Services Engineer Button Surface Vessel Navigation For Defense Applications In an environment without landmarks, naval vessel crews require precise navigation, autonomy and endurance. The Argonyx serves as an exceptional backup solution by providing dependable position and heading data without relying on GPS satellite signals. Anthony Full Director of Business Development, Navigation Systems Button Developing Simulation Environments Alongside New LEO Constellations This whitepaper explains the importance of simulation in response to new constellations, the benefits of developing a test environment alongside the development of the constellations, and how a flexible system is best equipped for the advent of new LEO constellations... Alaiya Tuntemeke-Winter Application Engineer Button BroadSim's Real-Time Terrain Effects Establishing realistic terrain effects within a NAVWAR simulator is becoming a highly sought-after feature when testing PNT systems for the warfighter. The BroadSim Product Family now provides a real-time Terrain Plug-In solution... Jaemin Powell Applications Engineer Button IMU Application Guide Learn about inertial measurement units (IMUs) and their wide range of applications. Safran Federal Systems has a variety of IMU solutions to meet your mission's needs. Safran Federal Systems SFS Button Equipment Pointing & Radar Directional Capabilities For Defense Applications Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) that provide true north-finding capabilities is an extremely helpful and flexible alternative because it allows vehicles to have high accuracy orientation capabilities for their mounted weapons or radar payloads. Anthony Full Director of Business Development, Navigation Systems Button Doppler Effects on Spaceborne PNT Applications More space missions are taking place in Lower Earth Orbit (LEO). Newer, more advanced receivers are needed to have sufficient PNT capabilities. Doppler shifts experienced on these missions will be high, however, robust testing to ensure mission success is achievable... Joshua Prentice Applications Engineer Button Miniature Rb Atomic Clock Improves Military Communications Performance This whitepaper was adapted from material presented at the 2021 Joint Navigation Conference by David Garigen (Orolia Defense & Security). Co-Authors Include: Alaiya Tuntemeke-Winter (Orolia Defense and Security), Serge Grop (Orolia), and Stavros Melachroinos (Orolia). Multiple Contributors ODS & Orolia Button Interference Threat Position Awareness The interference threat information provided from a Controlled Reception Pattern Antenna (CRPA) combined with reliable PNT sources, such as the Safran VersaPNT and Geonyx systems, can deliver situational awareness information, such as the approximate position of interference threat sources. Garrett Payne and Dylan Dayton Navigation and Electrical Engineers Button Land Vehicle Navigation in GNSS-Denied Environments for Defense Applications An Inertial Navigation System (INS) that provides reliable position and heading data is a unique backup solution because it allows vehicles to stay on course and maintain awareness of where they are without a GPS connection Anthony Full Director of Business Development, Navigation Systems Button Addressing Assured PNT needs through Open Standards This white paper guides engineering staff, integrators, and decision makers in recognizing the need for assured PNT in modernized systems. The adoption of open standard elements leads to improvements in technical performance and sustainment of systems... Brent Abbott Technical Engineering Manager Button BroadSim Flex Power Application Note Did you know that all BroadSim users can easily and automatically adjust the signal power of any code type for the satellites in your scenario? This free Flex Power feature can come in handy when creating scenarios for your unit under test... Jaemin Powell Applications Engineer Button

Empower NAVWAR dominance with patented jamming and spoofing sensor technology and real-time software plug-in to protect against GPS/GNSS denied environments. Home • Products • NAVWAR Electronic Warfare & NAVWAR Navigation Warfare (NAVWAR), a subset of Electronic Warfare , is gaining momentum as global conflict wages on. Effective NAVWAR operations demand tools that empower you to confidently assure or deny access to positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) data in challenging conditions. Test Detect Defeat Test PNT systems against threats, identify vulnerabilities, and iterate. PRODUCT | BROADSIM GENESIS BroadSim Genesis Test GNSS & PNT Sensors BroadSim Genesis simplifies advanced jamming and spoofing scenarios for Navigation Warfare (NAVWAR) testing. It supports high dynamics, jamming, spoofing, alternative RF navigation, and encrypted military codes. Simultaneously simulate multiple constellations, including GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Beidou, and SBAS. Boasting high-performing hardware, an innovative software engine, and an intuitive user interface, BroadSim Genesis is the ultimate testing solution. PRODUCT | BROADSIM SOLO BroadSim Solo Advanced Scenario Creation at Your Desk Bring advanced GNSS scenario creation to your desk and propel development cycles. Take advantage of software-defined benefits like the ability to simulate multiple constellations including AES M-Code, an intuitive user interface, high-dynamics, innovative features and ultra-low latency. BroadSim Solo's compact form factor fits nicely at your desk or workstation without taking over your space. PRODUCT | BROADSIM DUO BroadSim Duo Compact Dual Frequency GNSS Testing Powerhouse A successor to the widely adopted BroadSim Solo, the Duo is engineered to enable dual frequency GNSS simulation with support for essential unclassified signals like GPS P-Code and AES M-Code. This capability makes the BroadSim Duo an indispensable tool across a wide range of engineering applications, particularly where using fully classified simulators is untenable due to cost or security limitations. PRODUCT | BROADSIM WAVEFRONT BroadSim Wavefront Test CRPA Electronics BroadSim Wavefront is designed for multi-element antenna testing like CRPA’s. Calibrate GNSS frequencies in a matter of seconds. Simulate spoofers, jammers, repeaters, and alternate PNT sensors with just a few clicks, and signals all-in-view. The system is scalable from 4-16 elements at 600+ signals per element and 1,000 Hz iteration rate, and maintains a phase coherence of 1° 1σ. PRODUCT | BROADSIM ANECHOIC BroadSim Anechoic Test Entire PNT Systems Accurately simulate real-world GNSS environments in your Anechoic Chamber. BroadSim Anechoic has 32 individual RF outputs enabling the system to drive 16 dual-frequency antennas, giving you complete signal control and high dynamic range. Features like automatic antenna mapping, automatic time delay calibration, and automatic power loss calibration cuts calibration times from days to minutes. Defeat adversaries through coordinated offensive strategic action. PRODUCT | BROADSWORD BroadSword Real-Time Offensive NAVWAR Software Plug-In Empower NAVWAR dominance with a combat-proven, real-time software plug-in—engineered for seamless deployment across customer-owned systems and BroadSim platforms. This non-kinetic solution delivers precise electronic attack capabilities that elevate operational agility and strengthen strategic overmatch in contested domains. Learn how Safran's NAVWAR capabilities are aiding warfighters today. Speak to our sales team for more details . Detect live threats, deliver situational awareness, and correct course. PRODUCT | BroadSense Nano Handheld GPS Jamming & Spoofing Detection and Situational Awareness Sensor BroadSense is a GPS jamming and spoofing detection sensor designed to provide real-time and historical situational awareness data. Utilizing sophisticated GNSS receivers and patented jamming and spoofing detection algorithms, BroadSense can detect when the GPS signal or GPS spectrum is compromised. BROADSENSE NANO PRODUCT | BroadShield GPS Jamming and Spoofing Detection Software Integrated into Your Hardware BroadShield is a software library consisting of many patented algorithms designed to detect jamming and spoofing then immediately report the disruption to the PNT system. Leveraging this information enables the PNT system to take action to mitigate and protect from the jamming or spoofing. BROADSHIELD INQUIRE TODAY Electronic Warfare and NAVWAR: Know the Difference There are many forms of electronic warfare in today's modern battlefield. One of the more common arenas is within the Position, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) realm - or what our industry refers to as NAVWAR (Navigation Warfare). With expertise that goes back 30+ years, this is where Safran Federal Systems thrives. Protecting the U.S. Military from GPS Jamming and Spoofing GPS has transformed the battlefield in majorly benficial ways, however, jamming and spoofing have become a major threat. As threats evolve, so must our defenses. Watch this video to learn how to combat these threats and increase system resiliency from all different angles.

Stay up to date on Safran Federal Systems, Industry News, Press, and Media. Home • Company • Media & News Media & News Success Story: Accelerating Innovation for U.S. Special Operations Forces LEARN MORE → Safran Federal Systems Unveils HyperReveal AI Platform at GEOINT 2025 LEARN MORE → Safran Federal Systems announces the launch of the BroadSim Genesis at ION JNC 2025 LEARN MORE → Safran Federal Systems Earns Prestigious 2025 USA TODAY and Rochester Democrat and Chronicle Top Workplaces Awards LEARN MORE → LOAD MORE

This whitepaper was adapted from material presented at the 2021 Joint Navigation Conference by David Garigen (Orolia Defense & Security). Co-Authors Include: Alaiya Tuntemeke-Winter (Orolia Defense and Security), Serge Grop (Orolia), and Stavros Melachroinos (Orolia). Miniature Rb Atomic Clock Improves Military Communications Performance DOWNLOAD PDF By Multiple Contributors David Garigen (Orolia Defense & Security) Alaiya Tuntemeke-Winter (Orolia Defense and Security) Serge Grop, Stavros Melachroinos (Orolia) The mRO-50 is Orolia’s new low SWaP-C miniaturized rubidium oscillator. It is an innovative new atomic clock designed to meet core requirements for military ground and mobile radio communications applications. While maintaining the same volume as a standard oven-controlled crystal oscillator (OCXO), it provides better holdover and higher stability with the lowest power consumption amongst other miniature atomic clocks (MACs) in the market. It can be a drop-in replacement for many applications. The mRO-50 is lower cost than a Chip Scale Atomic Clock (CSAC), and due to its superior performance, small footprint, and low power consumption, it can be applied to many different applications. Namely, in telecommunications systems, it can improve the data throughput performance of networking waveforms, along with many non-networking waveforms. It can do this because its superior holdover and Allan deviation reduce the size of the guard bands, maximizing the volume of information that can be passed between radios. Figure 1: Orolia's mRO-50 The transfer and acquisition of time in DoD and commercial applications from both GNSS and non-GNSS sources has become an important topic in recent decades with greater demands for precision. Many atomic clock products have been designed to strike a balance between performance and cost that allow these goals to be met. This paper describes how the use of the mRO-50 addresses problems that can be seen on ground or mobile platforms using the LTE waveforms as example. The importance of oscillator holdover and the benefits of synchronizing radios in the field are also discussed. The SWaP-C of the mRO-50 now opens the door for systems integrators to use atomic clocks in manpack and vehicular radio applications, replacing what has traditionally been a TCXO. Modern radio communication requires that the transmitter and the receiver are tightly synchronized. This is to allow faster frequency hopping as well as the ability to network at high data rates largely due to a reduction in the size of the “guard bands”. A great example of the benefits of time synchronization is LTE, a commercial networking waveform that is focused on high data throughput. The evolution of this waveform is indicative of the evolution of other, similar waveforms. Referencing table 1 below, one can see that the time/phase requirement of LTE is 1.5us, and the time/phase requirement of LTE-A is 500ns. In one generation, the waveform’s synchronization requirement got tighter by a factor of 3. Table 1: LTE and LTE-A Requirements For commercial radios, such as cell phones, a high precision sync can be achieved using commercial GPS.The problem with relying on GNSS signals is that, in military applications especially, they can become unavailable due to jamming and spoofing by adversaries- or by natural effects, such as “urban canyons”, or natural canyons, blocking a direct line of sight to satellites of interest. There are also instances in cities and in the field where devices can enter these areas for extended periods of time. In these GPS denied environments devices can no longer sync using GPS, forcing the device into holdover. When in holdover it is important for radios to maintain a precise clock. Though some waveforms have features to help keep them synced without GPS, these features limit data throughput because they use bandwidth for sending sync pulses instead of data. In many commercial devices the oscillator will quickly drift away from the actual time. Below we can see a comparison of holdover performance of common Oscillators using LTE and LTE-A as reference. Figure 2: mRO, OCXO, and TCXO Comparison When coming out of holdover, if a device is out of sync with its peers, it will need to synchronize before any meaningful communications can be performed. In this situation, many waveforms will need to enter a “cell search” mode or some equivalent form of peer synchronization prior to communicating. A cell search will waste time (it can take minutes for this sync to complete)- and it will force the user to perform multiple transmissions, increasing the opportunity of detection by an adversary. If, on the other hand, an atomic clock is used (such as an mRO-50)- and synchronization is maintained, the user can immediately start communicating- without the need for a cell search. Guard Bands The waveforms used in modern military radios operate by assigning time slots to users to allow them to simultaneously pass information (as observed by the operator). This technique in telecommunications is known as time division multiple access (TDMA). Thus, if there are many users in a group, such as an infantry platoon, then they can all transmit and receive on the same frequency, as the precise transmit and receive times are sliced and allocated amongst the users. Each time slot, however, requires some time at the start and at the end, known as “guard bands”, to prevent the radios from “talking over each other” and destroying the message. If the radios are all perfectly synchronized, then the guard bands can be reduced to zero- and data throughput is maximized. In reality the radios are not well synchronized, and these guard bands can become significant, wasting valuable spectrum that could otherwise be used to pass more data. Thus, by improving the synchronization of the radios, the telecommunications system can maximize the data that can be passed over the air. The mRO-50 improves the timing synchronization, compared to a standard CSAC, by an order of magnitude due to its superior Allan deviation, bringing the system close to the ideal data throughput. Figure 3: Why does sync matter? Low SWaP-C, high precision atomic oscillators such as the mRO-50, also open the possibility for usage in UAV sensor payloads. These payloads often use GNSS to synchronize their clocks with other parts of the system. GPS outages can be problematic for both the UAV’s communications links and its inertial navigation systems (INS). The high stability of the atomic clock as the INS time base reduces the time integration error drift during extended GNSS outages, along with the telecommunications benefits already discussed. When the GNSS signal is disrupted, the UAV switches to the stable time base provided by the mRO-50 and can “coast” without a signal to maintain operations. The superior holdover time, offered by a mRO-50, allows the user to coast for a very long time. In fact, even when compared to a standard CSAC, the mRO-50 holdover time is more than 5x better in one day. New possibilities for telecommunications systems and UAV sensor payloads have been realized with the advent of low SWaP-C atomic clocks, such as the mRO-50. Early adaptations of these advanced technologies keep our warfighters equipped with the best technologies and provide them with the tactical edge on the battlefield. Conclusion The importance of precision in the acquisition of timing from GNSS and non-GNSS sources has increased in recent decades. Many atomic clock products have been designed to strike a balance between performance and cost that allow this new degree of accuracy to be met. The mRO-50 is Orolia’s new low SWaP-C Miniaturized Rubidium Atomic Clock, specifically designed to meet core requirements foreground, and mobile radio communications applications in terms of weight, size, and performance. It will enable more advanced telecommunications systems and the resilience of UAVs and other GNSS dependent technologies. This technology can be a drop-in replacement for a simple upgrade, yielding superior performance in various applications. DOWNLOAD PDF

Prepare for tomorrow. Find vulnerabilities today. Dive into the world of GPS interferences, how threats have evolved, and how engineers are using methods such as simulation to innovate and mitigate. Simulation Against Jamming and Spoofing DOWNLOAD PDF By Tim Erbes DOWNLOAD PDF

Reliance of GPS in modern land-warfare systems, potential effects of GPS disruption on their operation and considerations for protecting their ability to continue operating in a GPS-disrupted environment. Defense PNT in Challenged Environments DOWNLOAD PDF By Tim Erbes DOWNLOAD PDF

This paper outlines how to turn on/off spoofers and repeaters, adjust their power, and set a pseudorange offset. An example scenario will show the manual process by configuring the Skydel instances and the automated process by utilizing Skydel’s Python API. Controlling Power & Pseudorange Offsets of a Repeater Threat DOWNLOAD PDF By Jaemin Powell DOWNLOAD PDF

Safran Federal Systems provides assured positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) solutions, and custom engineering services to U.S. Government agencies, U.S. defense organizations, and their contractors. Your Assured PNT Mission Partner Safran Federal Systems is a trusted DoD mission partner providing cross-cutting Position, Navigation and Timing (PNT) solutions from the lab to the field. We leverage our industry leadership in Timing, Navigation, Simulation and NAVWAR to offer a unique blend of cost-effective A-PNT solutions bred through innovation. Our expertise in open systems architecture enables rapid delivery of emerging technologies to the warfighter across all domains. Safran Federal Systems Unveils HyperReveal AI Platform at GEOINT 2025 LEARN MORE → Safran Federal Systems announces BroadSim Genesis launch at JNC 2025 LEARN MORE → OUR EXPERTISE Safran helps customers succeed by designing the highest quality products at the best value, leveraging subject matter experts to provide unparalleled solutions, reducing cost, risk and schedule. GNSS Testing & Simulation Navigation Warfare (NAVWAR) Assured Positioning, Navigation & Timing (PNT) Inertial Navigation and IMUs Artificial Intelligence Custom Solutions INDUSTRY LEADING CAPABILITIES CRPA Testing Our CRPA testing solutions provide unrivaled scalability, phase-coherency and calibration, from testing entire PNT systems to antenna electronics. Discover why groups like the U.S. Air Force Guided Weapons Evaluation Facility trust us to support their test environment. M-Code Our M-Code PNT solutions support you during all phases of your mission, from testing and simulation to operating in the field. Discover why the world's most critical defense systems rely on us to provide M-Code. We are delivering today with no additional lead time. Navigation Warfare Navigation Warfare is emerging as a powerful non-kinetic strategy to counter adversaries. Our solutions, forged through years of operational expertise and relentless innovation, empower you to dominate the spectrum in the face of evolving threats. LEARN MORE LEARN MORE LEARN MORE MOSA and CMOSS Open Systems Architecture is the DNA behind our rapid prototyping and customer-focused solutions. As MOSA and CMOSS shape the future, we’re committed to aligning with these standards to deliver flexible, scalable, and enduring PNT within the CMFF framework. Search and Rescue Our signaling technology ensures safety in the most rugged and remote environments, with the world’s first Cospas-Sarsat certified second-generation capability. Discover why the U.S. Army chose us to produce beacons to meet their specific requirements. LEARN MORE LEARN MORE Success Story : Accelerating Innovation for U.S. Special Operations Forces In a fast-paced defense landscape, Safran Federal Systems, in close partnership with Anduril, played a pivotal role in rapidly delivering advanced capabilities to support U.S. Special Operations Forces. SUCCESS STORY Elevate Your Career Safran Federal Systems is growing and in need of high-quality talent. We offer competitive salaries, benefits, and flexible positions. A creative environment and fun culture can be checked off your list! Think you have what it takes to be on our team? Apply today. VIEW OPEN ROLES Safran Federal Systems is a Top Workplace! LEARN MORE → SPEAK TO SALES

This white paper guides engineering staff, integrators, and decision makers in recognizing the need for assured PNT in modernized systems. The adoption of open standard elements leads to improvements in technical performance and sustainment of systems... Addressing Assured PNT needs through Open Standards DOWNLOAD PDF By Brent Abbott Executive Summary With all military services actively focused on modernizing system capabilities and bringing the latest enhanced capabilities to the warfighter, Orolia continues to align our capabilities to include the integration of Military Code (M-Code) and advanced sensors to maintain trusted and assured PNT data even in a GPS denied and/or threatened environment. The benefits of assured PNT can be realized and addressed through the adoption of open standards. Section 1 of this document describes the need for assured PNT in any modernized system. Section 2 describes the adoption of open system architectures and its impact on process and business rules. Section 3 describes the adoption of SOSA and FACE and the impacts on competition generation. Section 4 covers the ability of the Air Force to rapidly innovate and plan. This document is intended to guide engineering staff, integrators, and decision makers in recognizing the need for assured PNT in modernized systems. The adoption of open standard elements leads to improvements in technical performance and sustainment of systems through the use of assured PNT in modernized systems. Section 1 - Assured PNT backbone Assured PNT is more than just beneficial. It is an integral part to any system as the basis of assured position, navigation and timing needed to maintain system operability. Position and navigation are required to update the warfighter with critical, real-time accurate location that can be used to act and react as necessary. Timing, arguably the most critical piece, ensures that the combination of system components operate at the highest capacity possible. Maintaining high operational performance is paramount to warfighter safety and success. Achieving and maintaining high operational performance is not an easy task. With each new mission, the environment will have an impact on the PNT solution used to drive system performance. Maintaining the integrity and trust of the PNT solution is of the utmost importance. For example, a simple delay in time of 1 millisecond or more can cause the navigation solution derived from an inertial navigation solution to diverge and provide incorrect position and velocity information. Likewise, the same millisecond (or even microsecond) inaccuracy in time can and will impact the integrity of a radar, EW, or SIGINT system. The need for resiliency is there. The need for a system that the warfighter can reliably trust is there. Through SOSA and FACE, Orolia provides a means for an Assured PNT that can protect, detect, and mitigate the impacts of emerging threats. Figure 1: The importance of integrity in Assured PNT With all military services actively focused on modernizing PNT and bringing the latest enhanced capabilities to the warfighter, vendors and government continue to align capabilities to include the integration of new technologies such as Military Code (M-Code) and advanced sensors to maintain trusted and Assured PNT data even in a GPS denied and/or threatened environment. The A-PNT solution must be layered. These PNT capabilities can be incorporated into an open standard architecture that allows for modular upgrades to any fielded platform. Alignment with an open standard makes this possible. Remaining agnostic to the platform allows for streamlined integration based on mission requirements. Figure 2: The layers of protection in a Resilient PNT solution The most versatile assured PNT card utilizes a layered approach. A timing reference with performance characteristics tailored to the system. A GPS or GNSS reference that can be hardened, easily updated, secure, and encrypted. An integrated sensor fusion platform capable of quick, seamless integration of new sensor and technologies to address emerging needs. An inertial measurement unit (IMU) that can provide high fidelity measurements in at least 6 degrees of freedom. Alternate assured PNT sources, such as odometry and RF signals, that are available and can be coupled and IMU and timing reference to provide reliable data even through GPS degraded and denied environments. A jamming and spoofing detection and mitigation platform, such as BroadShield, that provides integrity monitoring and statistical information both used in the sensor fusion platform as well as provided to other systems through a standard distribution interface. PNT distribution over a standardized data interface allowing for assured PNT distribution across cards. An A-PNT solution is backed by a solid foundation of sensors that play a large role in the performance of the navigation and timing solution. This solid foundation is built around two core competencies - timing and position. For timing, this can be an Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator (OCXO) up to miniaturized rubidium oscillators (mRO) and chip scale atomic clocks (CSAC). There are trade-offs that should be considered by a system designer which will determine which timing reference to use. Two of these items, phase noise and stability, are important for different reasons. Phase Noise – Phase noise is the noise generated from the rapid, short-term fluctuations in the phase (frequency) of the timing reference. These fluctuations spread the power of the signal to adjacent frequencies, causing noise and interference. In systems where the frequency reference is used to send and receive signals, the impacts may be viewed as amplitude variations of received signals, channel interference, and random rotations of received signals. Phase noise is unavoidable, but the impacts of phase noise can be mitigated by choosing low phase noise timing references. Stability – Stability can be ability for the timing reference to transmit at the designated frequency for the entire life of the device without any deviation. Short-term stability, frequency accuracy, and aging are important for signal integrity and co-channel interference. In systems that require very accurate frequencies with little drift or accurate phase coherence may look for stable timing references. Phase Noise and stability are important criteria to take into consideration but not all timing references support both low phase noise and stability. To complicate matters, vibration and system dynamics will have a large impact on the performance specifications for both phase noise and stability. Each system design has different requirements and using a modular approach, the requirements can be met through a signal A-PNT form factor. Through using an open standard, the difficulties behind integrating different timing references are mitigated by common architectures and platforms that facilitate rapid development, testing, and deployment. For position and navigation, the absolute reference typically used is an IMU. These devices can be described as commercial (automotive), tactical, navigation, and strategic grade. Figure 3: IMU grade comparison (leveraging Petovello) These grades directly correlate to the performance specifications and errors inherent to the IMUs. Figure 4: Comparison of IMU technologies and grades (Passaro) The errors and specifications will have an impact on the drift of the IMU, the lower the bias and noise, the less the IMU will drift. However, there is a trade-off in size, weight and power and cost when using higher grade parts. Not all systems require higher grade, larger IMUs when the smaller IMUs are adequate for the mission. Figure 5: Comparison of IMU technologies and grades (Passaro) An IMU will impact navigation performance in GPS degraded and denied environments when the only sensor to rely on is an IMU. Thus, incorporating other sensors like barometers, alternative signals, and location references can provide high fidelity estimations of position, velocity, heading and orientation. Not all these sensors are available in different platforms, so ensuring a modular approach to the A-PNT solution allows for swapping out different sensors, fusion algorithms, and capabilities to meet the system needs. As technology advances, IMUs capabilities will increase. Systems will soon be able to utilize high performance gyroscope in a small form factor meant for modular form factors. A modular A-PNT solution is the difference between operating over seconds to minutes without GPS versus operating for hours without GPS. Inside the A-PNT solution lies an integrity checking and monitoring solution. Through tests in the lab and during other test event opportunities, interference detection and mitigation (IDM) software must be thoroughly updated to address the ever-present threats. Using updated IDM software, the A-PNT solution introduces dual purpose situationally aware sensor fusion platform and protected system driver for the important PNT data. At a top level, PNT distribution over the VICTORY Data Bus allows for accessibility and information distribution that is agnostic to any system. Taking advantage of an open system architecture allows for system integrators to design systems around performance specifications and mission requirements without the need to also modify system components outside of the PNT card. A multi-layered A-PNT approach is needed to (1) maintain and improve situational awareness, (2) enable GPS denied mission operations, and (3) keep our warfighters safe through threatened environments. A-PNT solutions address these challenges by providing encrypted GPS M-Code signals, multiple layers of protection, and unprecedented capability to defeat and function in the presence of Electronic Warfare (EW) threats. An A-PNT sensor card that adheres to an open standard tackles very important criteria for any system used by warfighters today: Military Off-The-Shelf components – Procurement and sustainability are addressed through use of off-the-shelf components. Flexibility, Scalability and Upgradability – The system is flexible, scalable, and upgradable to newer sensors and technologies with developer support. Ease of Use and Ease of Integration – Easy for the integrator and user to operate with familiarity. PNT subject matter expertise – Allows for integrity and trust of the technology as a system designed around an integrated PNT sensor core. Not all systems are the same. As emerging missions evolve, so must the technology that is relied on by the warfighter. Historically, this has not been an easy task. Modular Open System Architecture (MOSA) has provided a means to address the need for rapid development, test, and integration of new technologies for emerging missions. The benefit of this should not be understated. Rapid development and test leads to simplifying the procurement challenges that confront acquisition efforts. Leveraging the open standards in SOSA and FACE alongside simulation technologies allows the Air Force to be ready when needed. Section 2 - The impacts on culture and practices Organizational structure is very delicate detail. Bureaucracy exists in all large organizations. The most successful organizations are methodical in their approach towards achieving success. These approaches are typically unique to the business or organization as there is not a “one size-fit-all” solution. The impacts of the differences in cultures and practices between organizations can and does impact the timeliness and effectiveness of decisions being made. Altering culture and practices that prevent timely and effective decisions is difficult, but it starts by making open systems available to the Air Staff. In the ecosystem that provides warfighters with the latest and greatest technology, intellectual property is owned by the vendor. This is problematic when trying to develop, test, and field systems for the warfighter. Adopting open standards like SOSA and FACE reduce the restrictions that impact information flow between governing bodies and vendors. Intellectual property is owned by vendors. This makes it difficult for the same information to be shared between vendors, between governing bodies, and between vendors and governing bodies. The goal of SOSA and FACE is to not own the intellectual property of the vendor but to make the interfaces and modules, used by the proposed solution, widely available. In removing the intellectual property barrier and making the interfaces and modules widely available reduces another pain point in the development of products. With known requirements for interfaces and modules, time is not spent on making the design decisions but rather on the development, test, and integration of the solution. This allows for the air fighter to improve speed, quality of decision support, and achieve greater alignment among Air Staff. Orolia had the opportunity to participate in an Open Innovation Lab (OIL) Plugfest. A Plugfest is typically an event, based on a technical standard or system, where the designers of some technology (electrical equipment or software capabilities) test the interoperability of their products or designs with those of other manufacturers. The technical goal is twofold: check compliance to the standard and test the effectiveness of the standard. Besides helping the vendors improve their interoperability, Plugfests help create awareness about the standard and can improve transparency on compliance. These Plugfests can be formal, providing public test scores or informal and private. SOSA and FACE provide opportunities through Plugfests and technical exchange meetings for vendors and government to not only stay informed of compliance and alignment success but also collaborate and innovate. Such opportunities are only made possible through the application of open standards and modular frameworks. During the OIL Plugfest, multiple vendors were asked to provide CMOSS, and SOSA aligned products to integrate alongside other cards and chassis. Years ago, such an event could not exist due to vendor restrictions. Open standards reduced the overhead requirements of designing the electrical and mechanical interface, understanding the software modules, and deciding on the form factor that would be implemented. In as little as 6 weeks, Orolia adapted a boxed based A-PNT solution to a card based A-PNT solution that was plug-in compatible with the system. Systems that adopt the Modular Open System Architecture (MOSA) provided by SOSA, CMOSS and FACE have proven to be modular, easily accessible, and easy to integrate. The end goal of any business or organization may not change, but the methods that may be employed must often adapt. Adaptation does not come easy but is necessary for constant improvement. Section 3 - Addressing long-term strategic competition MOSA is meant to enhance the department’s ability to modify weapon systems effectively. Modularization simplifies system design by making complexity manageable, enables programs to conduct parallel development efforts, and accommodates future uncertainty by allowing incremental changes to a system. A statement from the Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy: “A long-term strategic competition requires the seamless integration of multiple elements of national power – diplomacy, information, economics, finance, intelligence, law enforcement, and military. More than any other nation, America can expand the competitive space, seizing the initiative to challenge our competitors where we possess advantages, and they lack strength. A more lethal force, strong alliances and partnerships, American technological innovation, and a culture of performance will generate decisive and sustained U.S. military advantages.” Key edicts from the national defense strategy that can prove paramount to warfighter success. Open standards are a key differentiating factor that benefit both industry and government. As the needs of the warfighter continues to expand, technological capabilities employed by the warfighter must also continue to expand. Be strategically predictable, but operationally unpredictable . Adopting an open standard in SOSA and FACE provides the means to innovate and bring about new technologies. These technologies, either being improvements upon existing technologies or completely new technologies, will allow the warfighter to address this mission critical piece to competitiveness. Frustrating their efforts . Assured PNT is the backbone of any mission critical system. Knowledge of position and time will impact the functionality of any system. As such, position and time are very critical, and very susceptible components to a system designer or integrator. Competitors are aware of such a bottle neck and will try to disrupt these capabilities through this point of weakness. The need to protect, detect, and mitigate against such threats emerges every day. The need to rapidly address, innovate, and deploy the new technologies should not be slowed by proprietary interfaces, communication protocols, and process. Open System Architectures provide a means to counteract and even accelerate development and procurement to ensure success. Integrate with U.S. interagency . This edict expands to all aspects of U.S. interagency, including applying internally as well. The need to identify and build partnerships amongst military entities is an absolute requirement to address areas of economic, technological, and informational vulnerabilities. Such a task must not be hindered by the development or acquisition of systems caused by lack of information sharing and lack of common architectures. The deployment of common platforms, supported by MOSA, facilitates this agenda. Foster a competitive mindset . To succeed, new technologies must be robust and resilient. The key is to out-think, out-maneuver, and out-innovate the competitors. The use of resources to verify compliance and credibility is paramount to ensure any newly developed technology is deployable. New technologies can be developed using simulated environments without the overhead of working through proprietary methods which inevitably delays the development process and loses the competitive advantage. Using internal testing and hardware-in-the-loop capabilities that can emulate real world threats, developers and integrators can take that next step to developing resilient and assured capabilities. GPS simulators, either used on mobile test platforms or coupled with hardware-in-the-loop capabilities to simulate inertial movement, can shorten the development and testing that would be required for final integration. An evolving technological capability is an absolute requirement. Minimal impact to system interoperability is a key goal to ensuring that the edicts mentioned above are achieved. By allowing for modular open system architectures, rapid improvements can be made to A-PNT cards that include: Encryption – Layering and improving encryption methodologies (such as upgrading receivers in the field), it would be possible to harden GPS. A robust PNT ecosystem allows for a unified effort to improve encryption through affordable solutions. Threat Detection and Mitigation – Various algorithms can drive and improve filtering and help operators detect potentially malicious interference in navigation and timing systems. Through modular software components and hardware architectures, updating threat detection and mitigation capabilities using algorithms and layered PNT remains seamless. As new threats emerge, protecting the A-PNT through on-board interference detection and mitigation algorithms is a need. Improved signal processing – Emerging tools on the consumer side have improved the ability to process radio frequency signals. The NATO Research and Technology Organization points to improved signal processing as one of several key measures needed “to boost the resistance of GPS to [adversarial] jamming technologies.” High-end simulators can help the military to test such capabilities and get them into the field more quickly. Improved signal processing could also support more robust uses of PNT data leading to more effective systems. Higher receiver bandwidth, more accurate position and navigation, and phase coherent timing solutions are all results of the improved signal processing. Using analytics and modeling and simulation analyses, continuous testing can be performed to challenge the current systems and the potential to create new requirements to provide the correct PNT information. Advanced antennas – An advanced antenna creates focused beams and antenna patterns, focusing on where the satellites are and avoiding any potential interference. Strategically predictable yet unpredictable with the ability to adapt quickly. A high-level view of this approach and the different PNT information opportunities can be found in Figure 6: Figure 6: Available assured sensors for more robust solutions Each individual item adds a unique solution that is incorporated into the PNT solution provided by an A-PNT card. With opportunities to use these sensors, the ability to adapt, foster competition, and frustrate the competition is easier to achieve. While not all sensors may be available all the time, having choices allows for an adaptable solution that remains unpredictable and fosters interagency communication. Finally, the use of GPS simulators and other various test events drive collaboration among government and vendors alike. The Air Force must take advantage of operational tests that exercise the new technologies. With modular technologies and open, available standards that vendors have access to, the Air Force can quickly test these new technologies, fostering not only an atmosphere of collaboration but competitiveness as well. Section 4 - Preparing for the future starts now The goal is for any leveraged system to be the state of the art. Integration of the newest sensor and system technology, the highest operational performance, and the advancement of software design and implementation are of the utmost importance. These goals are shared both by vendors and government alike. Despite the common goal set, the approach has been different. As each approach is different, systems today result in tightly coupled integration without portability and flexibility. State of the art at the cost of flexibility decelerates the transition from the force that exists today to the Air Force the nation needs. To achieve technological preparedness, the groundwork must be laid now. Adopting a common framework through open standards is a means to do so. Utilizing a standard reference architecture helps remove the barriers prohibiting modularity, portability, and interoperability. Modularity . Software and sensor components drive the capability of the system. Vendor specific software leads to tightly coupled integration which prohibits the modularity of the software and system. The hardware modules must be decoupled from the software components such that software components and hardware modules can be developed and tested independently. This independence cuts down on development time and promotes the development of test tools that can be further leveraged to verify compliance and compatibility. VICTORY, as an example, promotes a standardized software interface. Along with a test tool and standards body, conformance and capability can be tested and verified without the need for specific hardware implementations. This allows developers to continue addressing near term implementation goals without relying on supply chain management or other roadblocks. Portability . Sensor components found in fielded systems are the backbone of the system functionality. These items must be easily replaced and updated to sustain and increase system performance. The same is applied to software components developed for systems and solutions. The need to port existing software solutions to newer processors or platforms will assist in reducing the impacts of supply chain or procurement initiatives. The adoption and implementation of open standards leads to portability between platforms. Ease of portability allows for integrators and decision makers to address emerging needs with resilient, tested, and trusted solutions. As an example, the Orolia C-PNT solution has been ported to multiple different platforms and iterations. The software is built to remain agnostic to sensors such that the inclusion of VICTORY, SOSA, CMOSS and FACE allow for easy portability to more available processors. Interoperability . Communication between components and modules is important for any functioning system. Plugfest opportunities help test the compliance, the interoperability, and performance of newly designed systems. Such events may only exist due in part to the adoption of MOSA and standards that are managed and agreed upon. As open standards bodies, SOSA and FACE host opportunities for vendors and government to test this interoperability. A key importance of interoperability is found in the ease of replacing technologies as well as updating technologies. For example, if the need arises to swap out an inoperable sensor or the need to update a sensor itself with a newer version, the interoperability of the sensor card is important to reduce integration and development time. Take, for example, the Modular Open RF Architecture established through SOSA. Figure 7: The MORA topology The VICTORY Position Navigation and Timing (PNT) is abstracted from the system software component types such that an end user can address and update components through a common standard data bus. The only limitation for an A-PNT solution to be updated or upgraded is the adherence to an established standard in VICTORY. With the communication and component level standardized, the three key aspects of modularity, portability and interoperability can easily be addressed with no impact on other devices or components of the system. The importance of removing these barriers allows for the Air Force to transition to the next level and take advantage of the state-of-the-art technologies. Removing the focus on integration and development and spending more time focusing on the strategic targets allows for success and safety of the warfighter. Giving the Air Force more time to address the areas of need allow for greater attention to be paid to the near term and long-term strategic mission. Evaluating acceptable levels of risk to mission, force and security is paramount to the success of any organization. Leveraging open system architectures and standards remains beneficial to this end goal. Conclusion Modernized systems require modernized technology. As the emerging needs grow and evolve, the technology needs to advance with it. As a mission critical piece to any modernized system, assured position, navigation, and timing technology cannot be hindered by tightly locked solutions that do not allow for modularity and growth. The capabilities must rapidly and effectively evolve. The adoption of open standards is a unified approach to addressing the needs of the air fighter today and for the future. To rapidly evolve, designers should not be burdened by lack of modularity, interoperability, or information flow. To effectively evolve, decision makers should not be burdened by information flow and process which detracts from more focus on planning and strategy. Promoting the collaboration between industry, academia and government will allow the Air Force to overcome any technical challenge. Such a change in culture and process can be facilitated through the adoption of open standards. They allow us to go fast, be effective, and most importantly, be successful. References ( Please note that the links below are good at the time of writing but cannot be guaranteed for the future .) Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) Reference Frameworks in Defense Acquisition Programs, published by the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, Director of Defense Research and Engineering for Advanced Capabilities, May 2020, refer to: https://ac.cto.mil/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/MOSA-Ref-Frame-May2020.pdf Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of The United States, authored by Jim Mattis, refer to: https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf FACE™ Technical Standard, Edition 3.1 (C207), published by The Open Group, July 2020; refer to: www.opengroup.org/library/c207 Technical Standard for SOSA™ Reference Architecture, Edition 1.0 (C212), published by The Open Group, September 2021; refer to: www.opengroup.org/library/c212 Gyroscope Technology and Applications: A Review of the Industrial Perspective, authored by Passaro, Cuccovillo, Valani, De Carlo, and Campanella. Methods for Accuracy Verification of Positioning Module authored by Patric Jansson Beyond GPS: A Multilayered Approach to Addressing PNT Vulnerabilities, authored by Adam Stone, refer to: https://www.orolia.com/beyond-gps-a-multilayered-approach-to-addressing-pnt-vulnerabilities/ Real-Time Integration of a Tactical-Grade IMU and GPS for High-Accuracy Positioning and Navigation, authored by Mark G. Petovello. About the Author Brent Abbott is an R&D technical lead and manager for Orolia Defense & Security, a leader in Assured Position, Navigation, and Timing products. He has a Bachelor’s and Master’s in Signal Processing and has worked in the DoD space for more than 13 years. He constantly seeks to promote the advancement of technology as seen through several PNT related patents, publications, and presentations. About The Open Group FACE™ Consortium The Open Group Future Airborne Capability Environment™ (FACE) Consortium, was formed as a government and industry partnership to define an open avionics environment for all military airborne platform types. Today, it is an aviation-focused professional group made up of industry suppliers, customers, academia, and users. The FACE Consortium provides a vendor-neutral forum for industry and government to work together to develop and consolidate the open standards, best practices, guidance documents, and business strategy necessary for acquisition of affordable software systems that promote innovation and rapid integration of portable capabilities across global defense programs. Further information on the FACE Consortium is available at www.opengroup.org/face . About The Open Group SOSA™ Consortium The Open Group SOSA™ Consortium enables government and industry to collaboratively develop open standards and best practices to enable, enhance, and accelerate the deployment of affordable, capable, interoperable sensor systems. The SOSA Consortium is creating open system reference architectures applicable to military and commercial sensor systems and a business model that balances stakeholder interests. The architectures employ modular design and use widely supported, consensus-based, non-proprietary standards for key interfaces. Further information on the SOSA Consortium is available at www.opengroup.org/sosa . About The Open Group The Open Group is a global consortium that enables the achievement of business objectives through technology standards. With more than 870 member organizations, we have a diverse membership that spans all sectors of the technology community – customers, systems and solutions suppliers, tool vendors, integrators, and consultants, as well as academics and researchers. The mission of The Open Group is to drive the creation of Boundaryless Information Flow™ achieved by: Working with customers to capture, understand, and address current and emerging requirements, establish policies, and share best practices. Working with suppliers, consortia, and standards bodies to develop consensus and facilitate interoperability, to evolve and integrate specifications and open-source technologies. Offering a comprehensive set of services to enhance the operational efficiency of consortia. Developing and operating the industry’s premier certification service and encouraging procurement of certified products. Further information on The Open Group is available at www.opengroup.org . DOWNLOAD PDF

​PANACEA is an autonomous GNSS environment simulator system for multi-receiver position, timing, navigation and velocity performance and vulnerability testing. Home • Products • GNSS Testing & Simulation • PANACEA PANACEA Autonomous PNT Performance and Vulnerability Test Suite PANACEA PRODUCT | GNSS TESTING & SIMULATION Receiver Compatibility Over 100 GNSS receivers including Collins Aero, Garmin, uBlox, and more Features Automation, custom scenarios, and testing ANY QUESTIONS? GET QUOTE About PANACEA is an autonomous GNSS performance and threat environment simulator system designed to control simulation hardware and collect data from up to 32 GNSS receivers simultaneously. Live Sky Scenarios PANACEA is capable of producing complete simulated environments and time synchronized live sky environments Automation PANACEA manages all receiver communications and then standardizes the output data into human readable .csv files. Builder The Builder is a software tool in PANACEA which makes creating custom scenarios a breeze for the user. Define scenarios to simulate jamming patterns, motions, power loss, delays, and more. Runner The Runner is a software tool in PANACEA which executes the test plan created in the builder. The runner provides real-time updates and data parameters, and other info, then converts data into files for analysis. Analysis Tool: Panorama Another program that works with PANACEA is Panorama, a data analysis tool that allows users to automatically generate visual data and reports on the test plans they run. LEARN MORE Click to download the PANACEA data sheet. VIEW DATA SHEET